A target to design toward

 I have difficulty with the technical or specific vision of VDP at its core. Of late I've fixated on the notion of having ChatGPT argue with itself until accepted by 2 Users/Humans.

Since I re-established the web site to a working - albeit incomplete - functional state - I have been thing and clicking on ideas for a next step. I may have found one.

I'm not sure what I found - but the image below strikes me as a presentation that folks who want to think may gravitate toward. 

The first section of "Core Arguments" can be a CHATGPT/summarization of articles by users - equal numbers on same subject/topic for opposing sides of an issue. Perhaps a feature of the elected official piece is to define an issue - for which users select or write articles to be summarized.

The second section "Evidence" - not sure how this is derived - but perhaps drawn from Journalist? This section is the most difficult to define. In the age of Trump/Maga, reality needs to be mutually agreed upon. 

The third section "Conclusions" would be a set of statements that users have agreed upon. Are they set by simple vote that can be certified? 


https://cookbook.openai.com/examples/how_to_call_functions_for_knowledge_retrieval



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can I have AI create me a website to be used by voters?

The next step completed - at a milestone of sorts

Reset or level set the routine